A Tennessee man is facing a domestic assault charge after he allegedly struck his mother with a ham during an argument Tuesday afternoon in their home.
Emanuel Cordell Kennedy, 37, was collared after his mother told cops that she was hit in the back with the thrown ham as she was walking down the hall, according to a Union City Police Department report excerpted here.
In an interview with police, Kennedy claimed that he did not intend to hit his mother, 55-year-old Brenda King, with the tossed ham. King apparently was not injured by the pink missile, the size of which was not detailed by investigators.
Kennedy, pictured in the above mug shot, is being held without bond in the Obion County jail. He is scheduled to be arraigned this afternoon on the misdemeanor count.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Nothing like being with family for the holidays? Anyway I hope you all have made great plans to relax with friends and family. I will be missing and thinking of my two Sons Trevor (Japan) and Joshua (USS DEWEY DDG-105) as they will be without their family.
Friday, November 18, 2011
Tuesday, November 8, 2011
It doesn't work that way
As a conservative thinker, I can be persuaded by logical, factual debate. The liberals have figured out that conservatives follow a code of ethics in their lives and have found ways to dupe us with faux arguments that sound logical and factual. But if you look at their positions on the whole there is no consistency. Consistency is another conservative value. In other words you are the same person at work as you are at home, as you are...
Recently Debbie Wasserman Schultz (DNC Chair) stated "Saying Life Begins at Conception Is ‘Extreme and Radical’" Of course she offers no proof to back this up, but here is the funny thing speaking of consistency. When looking for life, or proof of life on other planets, (i.e. Mars, the moon) they speculate the past existence of water and microbes as 'proof of life' but a much more complex organism (a sperm impregnated egg) is extreme and radical to be considered life?!
Again, the ACLU has crafted case law to make it no crime to perform a late term abortion (some with the baby partially out of the womb and is killed before it is completely delivered) but if you shoot a women 6 weeks pregnant you have committed double homicide?!
In a day and age where 'hypocritical' behavior can disqualify public figures both political and religious, it amazes me that our main stream news sources have no problem with blatant hypocrisy.
When Sharon Bailek accused Herman Cain, this week, of sexual misconduct 14 years ago, without proof, the media reports this as fact, with no background on the accuser. But when Bill Clinton had sexual misconduct charges publicly exposed, the same media did a 'Sarah Palin' level background check and reported only on damaging character traits of the accusers. Their goal was clearly to destroy the accusers and minimize the damage against Bill Clinton.
Liberals are using the exact same template to attack Cain as they did with Supreme Court Justice Nominee Clarence Thomas, using Anita Hill to make more unsubstantiated accusations against him. Their playbook is predictable: Truthful or not, the seriousness of the accusations will damage reputations. This is morally degenerate and a disgusting business as usual default position.
Liberal arguments are rife with nonfactual, unsubstantiated and politically motivated bumper sticker phrases and accusations against conservatives. They default to name calling in any intellectual confrontation and continually characterize their opponents as extreme.
As their viewer/readership ratings are plummeting, their rhetoric seems to increase and even when caught lying purposely to viewers to influence them against republicans, they are shameless to defend their non-existent integrity.
The disdain for the morally bankrupt nature of liberals, their agenda, and their media is the impetus for the Tea Party Movement. More people are conservative in nature than are radically liberal. We are done having a minority position shoved down our throats and our freedoms compromised or taken away altogether.
In 2012 you will see the conservative motivation burst forth like a storm of the century when liberals are soundly defeated and the restoration process begins. We will 'occupy' America once again with life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness!
Recently Debbie Wasserman Schultz (DNC Chair) stated "Saying Life Begins at Conception Is ‘Extreme and Radical’" Of course she offers no proof to back this up, but here is the funny thing speaking of consistency. When looking for life, or proof of life on other planets, (i.e. Mars, the moon) they speculate the past existence of water and microbes as 'proof of life' but a much more complex organism (a sperm impregnated egg) is extreme and radical to be considered life?!
Again, the ACLU has crafted case law to make it no crime to perform a late term abortion (some with the baby partially out of the womb and is killed before it is completely delivered) but if you shoot a women 6 weeks pregnant you have committed double homicide?!
In a day and age where 'hypocritical' behavior can disqualify public figures both political and religious, it amazes me that our main stream news sources have no problem with blatant hypocrisy.
When Sharon Bailek accused Herman Cain, this week, of sexual misconduct 14 years ago, without proof, the media reports this as fact, with no background on the accuser. But when Bill Clinton had sexual misconduct charges publicly exposed, the same media did a 'Sarah Palin' level background check and reported only on damaging character traits of the accusers. Their goal was clearly to destroy the accusers and minimize the damage against Bill Clinton.
Liberals are using the exact same template to attack Cain as they did with Supreme Court Justice Nominee Clarence Thomas, using Anita Hill to make more unsubstantiated accusations against him. Their playbook is predictable: Truthful or not, the seriousness of the accusations will damage reputations. This is morally degenerate and a disgusting business as usual default position.
Liberal arguments are rife with nonfactual, unsubstantiated and politically motivated bumper sticker phrases and accusations against conservatives. They default to name calling in any intellectual confrontation and continually characterize their opponents as extreme.
As their viewer/readership ratings are plummeting, their rhetoric seems to increase and even when caught lying purposely to viewers to influence them against republicans, they are shameless to defend their non-existent integrity.
The disdain for the morally bankrupt nature of liberals, their agenda, and their media is the impetus for the Tea Party Movement. More people are conservative in nature than are radically liberal. We are done having a minority position shoved down our throats and our freedoms compromised or taken away altogether.
In 2012 you will see the conservative motivation burst forth like a storm of the century when liberals are soundly defeated and the restoration process begins. We will 'occupy' America once again with life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness!
Thursday, October 20, 2011
We Said He Said
It seems to me that the reason the Left and Right have such a rift between them in this country today is due to words. That's right WORDS. The vocabulary of each side is so distinctly different from the other that we are having a difficult time communicating our actual intended thoughts. Being the moderator that I am, here is a guideline to help all of those on the left and right understand one another.
TransLiberAtor
What the Left Says
1. Tea Baggers
2. Congress need to pass..
3. I will create 1.2 million jobs
4. Right wing radical extremists
5. Maybe my Jobs bill was to big for Republicans to understand
6. We don't like the 9-9-9 plan
7. We want the rich to pay their fair share
8. We will make America Great Again
9. There was a Tea Party Rally with 5,000 in attendance
10. The Occupy protest had strong numbers
11. Tea Partiers are using strong language and have violent tendancies
12. Occupy protesters are passionate about their cause
What the Left Means
1. We Hate We Hate We Hate the Tea Party
2. Republicans need to abandon their principals
3. I will take more tax money to give to unions
4. War hero's who risked their lives for freedom
5. It's 10lbs of Manure in a 5lb bag
6. Damn thing might just work
7. And buy rich we mean anyone with a disposable income
8. Remember the days before the revolutionary war..ahhh the good ole days
9. WTF how did 100,000 people just show up at this thing?!
10. Even with our reporters joining in we could only muster 75 people
11. They are speaking the truth and are going to vote in the next election
12. They are raping women and crapping on Police cars
Ronald Reagan told the story of a republican politician who came to a democratic state to give a stump speech. He could only find one farmer to listen to him. He asked the farmer for something to stand on to deliver his speech. The farmer pointed to a mound of horse manure so he climbed up and started to pontificate. Afterwords the farmer said, "that was pretty good, it was the first time I have ever liked a republican speech." the politician said "thanks, it was the first time I have ever delivered a republican message from a democratic platform."
David W. Andersen
TransLiberAtor
What the Left Says
1. Tea Baggers
2. Congress need to pass..
3. I will create 1.2 million jobs
4. Right wing radical extremists
5. Maybe my Jobs bill was to big for Republicans to understand
6. We don't like the 9-9-9 plan
7. We want the rich to pay their fair share
8. We will make America Great Again
9. There was a Tea Party Rally with 5,000 in attendance
10. The Occupy protest had strong numbers
11. Tea Partiers are using strong language and have violent tendancies
12. Occupy protesters are passionate about their cause
What the Left Means
1. We Hate We Hate We Hate the Tea Party
2. Republicans need to abandon their principals
3. I will take more tax money to give to unions
4. War hero's who risked their lives for freedom
5. It's 10lbs of Manure in a 5lb bag
6. Damn thing might just work
7. And buy rich we mean anyone with a disposable income
8. Remember the days before the revolutionary war..ahhh the good ole days
9. WTF how did 100,000 people just show up at this thing?!
10. Even with our reporters joining in we could only muster 75 people
11. They are speaking the truth and are going to vote in the next election
12. They are raping women and crapping on Police cars
Ronald Reagan told the story of a republican politician who came to a democratic state to give a stump speech. He could only find one farmer to listen to him. He asked the farmer for something to stand on to deliver his speech. The farmer pointed to a mound of horse manure so he climbed up and started to pontificate. Afterwords the farmer said, "that was pretty good, it was the first time I have ever liked a republican speech." the politician said "thanks, it was the first time I have ever delivered a republican message from a democratic platform."
David W. Andersen
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
by David W. Andersen