Friday, December 10, 2010
Tuesday, December 7, 2010
Friday, November 5, 2010
A Democrat lies about everything (Obama), lies about his military service (Blumenthal), sells his vote (Stupak), has an extramarital affair (Clinton), cheats on his taxes (Rangle), accepts bribes (Murtha RIP), takes bribes (Jefferson), buys a Senate seat (Jackson), backs underage sex-trafficking (Cleaver), lives with a pimp (Frank), lies about racism (Carnahan), and on and on and on...
THEY ARE DEMOCRATS and IT IS EXPECTED OF THEM! They have no morals, there is no God, praise homosexuals, be politically correct, kill your baby, tax global warming, embrace illegals, bigger government is the answer to everything. The most corrupt Democrat is the most exalted
courtesy of fantum
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
Friday, October 29, 2010
The United States is a country that is Center-Right in it's political ideology. This can be seen by the viewer rating disparity between FOX NEWS and all of the other Liberal Media Outlets (CNN, MSNBC, CBS, NBC, ABC etc..)
In a dark smokey room somewhere in a secret underground bunker the brain trust of the liberals must have had the following conversation:
Lib1: "We have a problem, the sheep er uh people of this country are being informed by FOX and Talk Radio, so our time tested deceptions and misdirections aren't working anymore. We need a new mantra because 'They are going to cut your social security and starve our school Kids' isn't working for us anymore. But,I mean we can't actually TELL people what we want to do to this country and it's people or they would run us out on a rail. Any suggestions?"
Lib2: "Well these problem people are the ones who relate to the Tea Party Movement so we can say they are racist"
Lib1: "Won't work, are we going to call 75% of the country a bunch of racists? I think Not. Next.."
Lib3: "Well we can say they are violent militia members and try to scare them into not voting for those candidates"
Lib1: "Again they make up a huge majority of the country, we don't want to give them any ideas. Gun sales are up 500% since Obama was elected. There has to be something better that that.
Lib4: "Why don't we just pretend that we ARE the plumb-line of America and anyone who doesn't share our point of view are extremist wacko's"
Lib1: "Hmmm, that has been our most successful approach in the past, I mean it bit us in the ass when we voted Hilter Time magazines person of the year that one time and he made us look bad by killing all of those Jew.. wait do we believe in the Holocaust? (affirmative nods) Okay yeah Hitler really blew it for us. Let's just say that all of the Tea Party candidates are extreme, dangerous, and far out of the mainstream.. which is us!"
Lib5: "Um, so what are we going to look like when Angle, Miller and O'Donnell get elected?"
Lib1: "We just have Keith make them the Worst Person In The World an extra couple of times and people will forget about all that"
Lib6: "Okay, let's talk about the president. I mean if he doesn't work with the conservative congress how are we going to create wealth so we can redistribute it?"
Lib1: "That's the problem with socialism, eventually we run out of other peoples money. I'm afraid we are running out of options boys. We might have to suffer another 8-12 years of conservative tax cuts, job building, shrinking government and cutting entitlements. Look on the bright side, our homes will be worth more than we owe after a couple of years of those kind of policies.. (group laughter)"
Soros: We have to be more patient like Muslim terrorists, we wait until they feel secure and then we strike again. All we have to do is try to hold onto what we've gotten this time around. It may not be the next time or the time after that but we will see a communist government in America eventually. Hang in there boys."
Now maybe it wasn't exactly like that but the talking heads are all getting their exact wording to slant stories and smear people from somewhere.
Conservative women are taking a great amount of flak right now, perhaps more unfair treatment and characterization than any other people group an any time save the Jewish nation. I predict (I have been pretty accurate on these over the past few years) that our next president or Vice President will be a conservative women. I also believe that they will be the one's to break the 'establishment' republican/democrat hold on congress. It has been my experience that when men screw things up to the point of making women's lives unbearable (and it takes alot) women take things into their own hands and pragmatically (not ideologically) fix things.
So to all of you conservative ladies out there I just want to say "How is that hope and change working out for you, cause we could really use some help..."
By David W. Andersen
Monday, October 25, 2010
Friday, October 22, 2010
Stacy, Kenny and I are going down to Long Beach area tomorrow to see a Catalina 30 sailboat. The owner is a friend of a friend and he may sell it to us on payments pretty cheap. This isn't the boat but it is same year and make.
Thursday, October 21, 2010
Q? On November 2nd 2010 Do you think that Democrats will engage in voter fraud in order to save their jobs?
I think there is growing evidence that voter fraud played a big part in the make up of Congress in the 2008 elections and we hear new stories every day.
How to Steal an Election
What we are seeing is the transplantation of Chicago politics to communities throughout the nation that are completely unprepared for the level of fraud and intimidation that can be generated by thousands of unethical Democrats, including private citizens, local, state, and federal officials, and politicians, convinced that breaking the law is okay as long as the “right” candidate wins.
On July 6, American Thinker published an article by Lee Cary about an interview with a Chicago political machine insider. It contained the following warning:
“In Chicago, the Precinct Captains watch to see who votes and who doesn’t. Then, at the end of the day, others will cast votes for those who haven’t shown up to vote, all under the direction of the Precinct Captain. If the actual voter shows up later, they’re given someone else’s card. The Republican poll watchers don’t stop this. Hell, most of them are actually Democrats.”
The Democrat Voter Fraud Playbook is as follows:
ACORN registers the names, legitimate or not.
Black Panther, SEIU and other “community organizer” groups intimidate people, especially minorities, from voting Republican.
Voter lists remain unscrubbed of felons, dead people, and illegal immigrants.
On Election Day, precinct workers submit any unused ballots for Democrat candidates.
Democrat officials and politicians pretend like nothing happened.
It’s as easy as that to steal an election.
An Army of Republican Poll Watchers Will Be Needed this November
The voter fraud stories so far are just the tip of a very large iceberg. No one really knows the full extent of the problem and the Democratic Party is counting on Americans to shrug it off as just another conservative conspiracy theory.
But take it from a lifelong Chicagoan, it’s not just Bosnia that needs election observers to keep voter fraud in check.
The dropping of voter intimidation charges by Department of Justice political appointees against billy club wielding Black Panthers sends the message to the Democrat community that mass voter fraud can continue without fear of legal reprisal.
Justice officials know full well that if they were to start digging around this Pandora’s Box of fraud, many influential Democratic organizations (especially ACORN) and politicians will be implicated. So they go straight to Step #5 from above and pretend like there’s nothing to see.
While the problem may be substantial, there is one way Republicans can fight back: Keep a close eye on voting locations. Election fraud only works if citizens remain ignorant to the problem and unwilling to become involved in the voting process.
Considering the importance of the upcoming November elections, an army of Republican poll watchers, especially in minority neighborhoods which are often treated like never ending vote generating machines by unscrupulous Democrat politicians, will be needed to prevent liberals from once again stuffing ballot boxes and gaming the system.
Friday, October 15, 2010
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Monday, August 30, 2010
The last refuge of a liberal
Liberalism under siege is an ugly sight indeed. Just yesterday it was all hope and change and returning power to the people. But the people have proved so disappointing. Their recalcitrance has, in only 19 months, turned the predicted 40-year liberal ascendancy (James Carville) into a full retreat. Ah, the people, the little people, the small-town people, the "bitter" people, as Barack Obama in an unguarded moment once memorably called them, clinging "to guns or religion or" -- this part is less remembered -- "antipathy toward people who aren't like them."
That's a polite way of saying: clinging to bigotry. And promiscuous charges of bigotry are precisely how our current rulers and their vast media auxiliary react to an obstreperous citizenry that insists on incorrect thinking.
-- Resistance to the vast expansion of government power, intrusiveness and debt, as represented by the Tea Party movement? Why, racist resentment toward a black president.
-- Disgust and alarm with the federal government's unwillingness to curb illegal immigration, as crystallized in the Arizona law? Nativism.
-- Opposition to a 15-story Islamic center and mosque near Ground Zero? Islamophobia.
Now we know why the country has become "ungovernable," last year's excuse for the Democrats' failure of governance: Who can possibly govern a nation of racist, nativist, homophobic Islamophobes?
Note what connects these issues. In every one, liberals have lost the argument in the court of public opinion. Majorities -- often lopsided majorities -- oppose President Obama's social-democratic agenda (e.g., the stimulus, Obamacare), support the Arizona law, oppose gay marriage and reject a mosque near Ground Zero.
What's a liberal to do? Pull out the bigotry charge, the trump that preempts debate and gives no credit to the seriousness and substance of the contrary argument. The most venerable of these trumps is, of course, the race card. When the Tea Party arose, a spontaneous, leaderless and perfectly natural (and traditionally American) reaction to the vast expansion of government intrinsic to the president's proudly proclaimed transformational agenda, the liberal commentariat cast it as a mob of angry white yahoos disguising their antipathy to a black president by cleverly speaking in economic terms.
Then came Arizona and S.B. 1070. It seems impossible for the left to believe that people of good will could hold that: (a) illegal immigration should be illegal, (b) the federal government should not hold border enforcement hostage to comprehensive reform, i.e., amnesty, (c) every country has the right to determine the composition of its immigrant population.
As for Proposition 8, is it so hard to see why people might believe that a single judge overturning the will of 7 million voters is an affront to democracy? And that seeing merit in retaining the structure of the most ancient and fundamental of all social institutions is something other than an alleged hatred of gays -- particularly since the opposite-gender requirement has characterized virtually every society in all the millennia until just a few years ago?
And now the mosque near Ground Zero. The intelligentsia is near unanimous that the only possible grounds for opposition is bigotry toward Muslims. This smug attribution of bigotry to two-thirds of the population hinges on the insistence on a complete lack of connection between Islam and radical Islam, a proposition that dovetails perfectly with the Obama administration's pretense that we are at war with nothing more than "violent extremists" of inscrutable motive and indiscernible belief. Those who reject this as both ridiculous and politically correct (an admitted redundancy) are declared Islamophobes, the ad hominem du jour.
It is a measure of the corruption of liberal thought and the collapse of its self-confidence that, finding itself so widely repudiated, it resorts reflexively to the cheapest race-baiting (in a colorful variety of forms). Indeed, how can one reason with a nation of pitchfork-wielding mobs brimming with "antipathy toward people who aren't like them" -- blacks, Hispanics, gays and Muslims -- a nation that is, as Michelle Obama once put it succinctly, "just downright mean"?
The Democrats are going to get beaten badly in November. Not just because the economy is ailing. And not just because Obama over-read his mandate in governing too far left. But because a comeuppance is due the arrogant elites whose undisguised contempt for the great unwashed prevents them from conceding a modicum of serious thought to those who dare oppose them.
Tuesday, August 3, 2010
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Obama Finds a Legal Way Around The 2nd Amendment.
If This Passes, There Will Be WAR
On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban
All Firearms in the United States
On Wednesday the Obama administration took its first major
step in a plan to ban all firearms in the United States.
The Obama administration intends to force gun control and
a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the
signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By
signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama
administration can use the US State Department to bypass
the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US
Government signs these international treaties, all US
citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by
foreign governments. These are laws that have been
developed and promoted by organizations such as the United
Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael
Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to
the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms.
The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and
methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to
our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what
has happened. Obama can appear before the public and tell
them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in
the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws,
while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary
Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and
foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling
the truth? What it means is that there will be no
publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in
Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the
United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm
and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public.
We will wake up another morning and find that the US has
signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm
ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning
and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US
citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local
government collection and destruction center or face
This is not a joke nor a false
warning. As sure as government health care will be forced
on us by the Obama administration through whatever means
necessary, so will gun control.
Read the Article
U.S. reverses stance on treaty to
regulate arms trade
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The
United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it
would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms
sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance
critics said gave every nation a veto.
The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S.
State Department, overturns the position of former
President George W. Bush's administration, which had
opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national
controls were better.
View The Full Article Here http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSTRE59E0Q920091015
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Thursday, March 25, 2010
I remembered how I felt post 9-11 when both parties worked together to make sense of the attack on the Towers in NYC. I remember how no one was 'grabbing' the lime light and trying to paint the other party in a negative light or minimize their accomplishments. I remember seeing CSPAN coverage of debates and hearing both sides making sensible arguments.. I remember thinking how glad I was that we had such good people in our government.